The Ratepayer Protection Act does not consider those cumulative costs and only addresses “a very narrow piece of utility costs,” Walsh said.
Advocates also allege the bill takes the wrong approach to consumer protection.
>>> Brandon Jones Holds Off Chase Elliott in Overtime Thriller at Chicagoland
“Congress is treating datacenter buildout like it’s inevitable, when lawmakers actually have the power to slow it down and prioritize protecting our communities, air, water and wallets,” said Camden Weber, an energy policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity.
One provision would reduce National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) evaluations for transmission lines or other infrastructure, speeding up datacenter development.
Connecting to the nation’s energy grid can delay datacenter projects by as much as 12 years, so big tech is increasingly building their own gas plants or clean energy infrastructure.
But the centers still use natural gas pipelines and massive quantities of fuel, driving up costs for individual consumers.
“These bills make datacenter investments less risky for utilities, which only accelerates buildout at a time when communities across the country are calling for more scrutiny,” Weber said.
Walsh pointed to Georgia, where some regulators failed to protect water resources and initially did not charge a datacenter for 30 million gallons of water use.
Most new datacenters use PFAS “forever chemicals” for cooling, which likely pollute the surrounding area and present a greenhouse gas threat, but no emission standards exist.
“We don’t have the regulatory regime to regulate datacenters, but we’re fast-tracking the projects,” Walsh said.
The provisions that do rein in costs are mere suggestions for state regulators, who are already accused of putting datacenter needs first and failing to protect residential ratepayers.
>>> Mike Vrabel and Wife Attend Swift-Kelce Wedding After Personal Leave
“They’re misleading the public and making it sound like they’re doing more than they are,” Walsh said.
