Seymour, who cares for her disabled husband, maintains that no previous issues ever occurred at the location.
>>> Andy Murray Joins Jack Draper as Coach for Wimbledon
"I've done nothing wrong here, you're not taking pictures of me," said Seymour.
Supermarkets operate as private property and retain the legal right to refuse service or bar individuals to ensure safety, provided the action does not violate anti-discrimination laws.
Common grounds for such restrictions include theft, antisocial behavior, or aggression toward staff.
"I'm not that sort of person, I never cause trouble, I never do any trouble – they're saying it to get out of everything.
I want to clear my name," said Seymour.
Sainsbury's management defended the enforcement, emphasizing that employee safety remains a priority.
The corporate office confirmed that the decision was based on multiple recorded events over an extended period.
"We want everyone to feel welcome when they shop with us, and our colleagues work hard to create a positive in-store experience.
We take any form of abusive and inappropriate behaviour seriously," said a Sainsbury's spokesperson.
The retailer stated that the final decision to withdraw shopping privileges from the Hook location was thoroughly reviewed before implementation.
"Following a number of incidents over time, a decision was taken to withdraw this individual's right to shop at our Hook store.
>>> GAO Report Reveals F-35 Fighter Jet Readiness Drops to 25 Percent
This action was not taken lightly, but the safety and well-being of colleagues and customers always come first," said a Sainsbury's spokesperson.
